I try to understand good storytelling. What goes into that story, and why. The why is important, and the what takes thought. The Self-Publishing Review is . . . interesting at its best, annoying at its worst. What happens there is indicative of the entire professional publishing industry as a whole. Magazines, agents, publishers. Basically, she counts fifteen mistakes in however many pages, and she stops reading. If you have fifteen mistakes on your first page, you’re done, and so is she. I’m fairly sure they all do that. Pro magazines, agents and publishers. As much as I enjoy her ruthless honesty, I wouldn’t send anything of mine. In one book alone I’ve made about 200 corrections. Most were punctuation mistakes. I also removed a slew of redundant words, and found twenty new typos. I’m still not done. When I am, I would have to spend about $3,000 (not in this lifetime) to have an editor go over it all one last time; a comprehensive line by line edit, just to be sure. I’m 98.9% percent now, and will be 99.8% when I’m completely done. Will it be enough? Me, alone, with only myself to rely on? Probably not. I have six agent-rejected novels now, but I’m doing this for my future readers. My next six novels will probably be rejected, and one can hope they won’t be, but the reason won’t be me or my writing.
BTW, many thumping-great novels will never see print. Agents see them now and again, but if they can’t sell them to a publisher, they send out a form rejection slip. Their words. Their truth. Sucks shit, doesn’t it? LOL
Labels: AAR acredited agents, editing, grammar, magazines, publishers, words, writing